This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Darren Mize, ASA, September 15, 2020. Let’s review the 3 approaches to value: Cost Approach Market Approach Income Approach. The Cost Approach. The Cost approach relies on the business’s balance sheet. So, unless the company is heavily invested in assets this approach is rarely used. The Market Approach. The Market approach relies on comparable business transactions within the same industry.
Dependent Defined, 26 CFR Part 1, 85 Fed. Reg. 64383 (Oct. 13, 2020). Available at [link]. The IRS has issued final regulations that clarify how the income test for being a qualifying relative applies for taxable years 2018–2025. As background, the Code defines a dependent as a “qualifying child” or a “qualifying relative.” One requirement for being a qualifying relative is that the individual’s gross income must be less than the exemption amount under Code § 151(d) (sometimes called the “incom
Shareholder rights (at least in Delaware) include the right to inspect the books and records of the company for a “proper purpose”. What is a proper purpose? We’ll be covering a number of cases in the coming months on this oft-contested issue. For today: enter Woods Tr. of Avery L. Woods Tr. v. Sahara Enterprises, Inc. , No. CV 2020-0153-JTL, 2020 WL 5200421, at *5 (Del.
The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Antitrust Division issued a new Merger Remedies Manual on September 3, clarifying the analytical framework it is using to evaluate remedies that may address competitive harms stemming from proposed mergers and acquisitions, as well as from consummated mergers. In announcing the modernized Manual, Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim said that it reflects DOJ’s “renewed focus on enforcing obligations in consent decrees and reaffirms the Division’s commitm
Speaker: Susan Spencer, Principal of Spencer Communications
Intent signal data can go a long way toward shortening sales cycles and closing more deals. The challenge is deciding which is the best type of intent data to help your company meet its sales and marketing goals. In this webinar, Susan Spencer, fractional CMO and principal of Spencer Communications, will unpack the differences between contact-level and company-level intent signals.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 8,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content