This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
We’ve covered before some reactions to the Aruba decision. In the time since the decision, numerous law firms have provided further commentary on the decision, including: Ropes & Gray. White & Williams. Fried Frank. Locke Lord. Cadwalader. Potter Anderson. Sullivan & Cromwell. Wilkie Farr. Skadden (.pdf).
The HLS Forum on Corporate Governance has this blog post discussing Aruba’s aftermath, and in particular, whether Aruba has returned the core focus of appraisal to a Dell compliance analysis – something we’ve discussed before.
We’ve covered the Mobile Posse case before , specifically, how it shows the importance of getting the basics right regarding appraisal notices. The Delaware Litigation blog provides more on Mobile Posse , including a recap of whether a post-suit “do over” is available: “The company sought a “do-over” or a mulligan for its statutory errors, because it purported to send proper notices required by DGCL Section 262–only after suit was filed.
The State Board of Administration of Florida’s proxy guidelines join a number of others in suggesting that investors vote FOR appraisal rights when available. For institutional investors, appraisal rights are a critical shareholder protection, especially in instances where the merger process raises questions or where market dislocation results in a value gap between merger and closing.
Speaker: Susan Spencer, Principal of Spencer Communications
Intent signal data can go a long way toward shortening sales cycles and closing more deals. The challenge is deciding which is the best type of intent data to help your company meet its sales and marketing goals. In this webinar, Susan Spencer, fractional CMO and principal of Spencer Communications, will unpack the differences between contact-level and company-level intent signals.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 8,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content