This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
As 2019 kicks off, the Cooley antitrust group highlights 10 recent developments and trends corporate counsel should be aware of – from the US Supreme Court and lower courts, the Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission and enforcers around the world – that are likely to impact businesses this year and beyond. Read full article. Jacqueline Grise.
In 2017, Rwanda amended its companies act and introduced appraisal rights for minority shareholders [.pdf]. A recent article in the New Times provides an overview of, and reflects on, the efficacy of Rwandan appraisal. The parallels between Rwandan appraisal (as described in the links provided) and Delaware appraisal are notable: appraisal is offered to dissenting shareholders who would otherwise be forced to accept certain major corporate actions (such as a merger); the dissenting shareholder
Question: What’s the going rate to hire a business owner these days? Or put another way… how much should an owner-operator pay themselves? In some privately held companies that may be a question that is answered by the Board of Directors. But in most privately held companies it’s a question answered by a single person: […].
Probably not. But this interesting analysis on the possibility of crypto asset mergers certainly allows for the possibility. We’ve covered blockchain and appraisal before, including the possibility of having shares put onto a blockchain, allowing for easier tracing, counting, voting, and other improvements over the current system of fungible bulk; but this is something different.
Speaker: Susan Spencer, Principal of Spencer Communications
Intent signal data can go a long way toward shortening sales cycles and closing more deals. The challenge is deciding which is the best type of intent data to help your company meet its sales and marketing goals. In this webinar, Susan Spencer, fractional CMO and principal of Spencer Communications, will unpack the differences between contact-level and company-level intent signals.
On March 27, 2019, at 10 a.m., the Delaware Supreme Court will hold argument in the Aruba Networks appraisal case. We’ve covered the Aruba decision before , along with some of the impact the case has had on the appraisal landscape. Little doubt the argument before the Delaware Supreme Court will be enlightening to anyone interested in appraisal; we’ll have a further update after the argument.
The vast majority of publicly announced mergers are approved by shareholders, certainly more than 90% no matter how you reasonably slice the data. One way to view this data is that shareholder votes are perfunctory rubber stamps; but another is to view the merger process as self-selecting – a publicly announced merger is one that acquirer and target believe will receive shareholder approval.
No. At least according to Vice Chancellor Slights III in the case In re Xura, Inc. Stockholder Litigation , C.A. No. 12698-VCS (Del. Ch. Dec. 11, 2018). While it is true that in many circumstances appraisal is the exclusive remedy… not always! Xura highlights that the facts of each case matter and that an investor needs to think about the full suite of their potential claims and options in any merger dispute.
No. At least according to Vice Chancellor Slights III in the case In re Xura, Inc. Stockholder Litigation , C.A. No. 12698-VCS (Del. Ch. Dec. 11, 2018). While it is true that in many circumstances appraisal is the exclusive remedy… not always! Xura highlights that the facts of each case matter and that an investor needs to think about the full suite of their potential claims and options in any merger dispute.
The Delaware Supreme Court has a few appraisal cases on its docket in 2019, including a case regarding what constitutes a robust – “Dell Compliant” – sales process as well as a case regarding how to understand synergies in appraisal. For a view of 2019 cases of note, see this coverage by law.com [$$$].
Earlier in 2018, the Tennessee Supreme Court clarified Tennessee’s appraisal and valuation law in the case Athlon Sports Communications v. Duggan. Tennessee had long followed the “Delaware Block” system of valuation. The Delaware Block system averages market value, asset value, and earnings value to arrive at a valuation. But as one commentator has observed “In the last 25 years, the traditional Delaware Block framework has become outmoded and less relied on by courts and valuation analysts.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 8,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content