This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
If you have been reading my posts, you know that I have an obsession with equity riskpremiums, which I believe lie at the center of almost every substantive debate in markets and investing. That said, I don't blame you, if are confused not only about how I estimate this premium, but what it measures.
Related research from the Program on Corporate Governance includes Rethinking Basic (discussed on the Forum here ) by Lucian Bebchuk and Allen Ferrell; and Price Impact, Materiality, and Halliburton II (discussed on the Forum here ) by Allen Ferrell and Andrew H. This post is based on their recent paper.
The other is the dangerous notion that measuring risk is the same as managing that risk and, in some cases, the even more insane view that it removes that risk. In corporatefinance, this takes the form of a hurdle rate , a minimum acceptable return on an investment, for it to be funded.
The rise in rates transmitted to corporate bond market rates, with a concurrent rise in default spreads exacerbating the damage to investors. Thus, at least in the corporate bond market, the default spread(s) become the market price of risk or riskpremium for debt markets.
CorporateFinance : Corporatefinance is the development of the first financial principles that govern how to run a business. It is that mission that makes corporatefinance the ultimate big picture class, one that everyone (entrepreneurs, investors, analysts, business observers) should take.
Understanding that riskfree rates vary across currencies primarily because of difference in inflation expectations is the first step to sanity in dealing with currencies in corporatefinance and valuation. Corporate Borrowing As riskfree rates fluctuate, they affect the rates at which private businesses can borrow money.
Gianfala is a Vice President of the Valuation Advisory group with over 15 years of experience in accounting, corporatefinance, and business valuations. Nene Gianfala | ASA-BV/IA, CPA/ABV | Vice President, Shareholder | Chaffe and Associates Ms. She joined Chaffe & Associates, Inc.
After the rating downgrade, my mailbox was inundated with questions of what this action meant for investing, in general, and for corporatefinance and valuation practice, in particular, and this post is my attempt to answer them all with one post. What is a risk free investment? Why does the risk-free rate matter?
Check rules of thumb : Investing and corporatefinance are full of rules of thumb, many of long standing. When valuing or analyzing a company, I find myself looking for and using macro data (riskpremiums, default spreads, tax rates) and industry-level data on profitability, risk and leverage. Debt breakdown 2.
The first is that I do not have a macro focus, and my interests in macro variables occur only in the context of corporatefinance or valuation issues. In the same dataset where I compute historical equity riskpremiums, I report historical returns on corporate bonds in two ratings classes (Moody’s Aaa and Baa ratings).
In my last three posts, I looked at the macro (equity riskpremiums, default spreads, risk free rates) and micro (company risk measures) that feed into the expected returns we demand on investments, and argued that these expected returns become hurdle rates for businesses, in the form of costs of equity and capital.
An Optimizing Tool In my second and third data posts for this year, I chronicled the effects of rising interest rates and riskpremiums on costs of equity and capital. In computing the latter, I used the current debt ratios for firms, but made no attempt to evaluate whether these mixes were "right" or not.
A few of these variables are macro variables, but only those that I find useful in corporatefinance and valuation, and not easily accessible in public data bases. Rather than replicate that data, my macroeconomic datasets relate to four key variables that I use in corporatefinance and valuation.
With stocks, I compute this pre-personal tax return at the start of every month, using the current level of index and expected cash flows to back out an internal rate of return; this is the basis for the implied equity riskpremium. It is one more reason that blindly using historical riskpremiums can lead to static and strange values.
In particular, there are wide variations in how risk is measured, and once measured, across companies and countries, and those variations can lead to differences in expected returns and hurdle rates, central to both corporatefinance and investing judgments.
In my corporatefinance class, I describe all decisions that companies make as falling into one of three buckets – investing decisions, financing decision and dividend decisions. Equity RiskPremiums 2. Financing Flows 5. Dividends and Potential Dividends (FCFE) 1. Buybacks 2. Return on (invested) capital 2.
In corporatefinance and investing, which are areas that I work in, I find myself doing double takes as I listen to politicians, market experts and economists making statements about company and market behavior that are fairy tales, and data is often my weapon for discerning the truth. Beta & Risk 1. Equity RiskPremiums 2.
In the first five posts, I have looked at the macro numbers that drive global markets, from interest rates to riskpremiums, but it is not my preferred habitat. A few years ago, I wrote a paper for practitioners on the cost of capital , where I described the cost of capital as the Swiss Army knife of finance, because of its many uses.
The value per share that I estimate for Nvidia dropped from $87 in September 2024 to $78 in January 2025, much of that change driven by the smaller AI chip market that comes out of the DeepSeek disruption (with the rest of the decline arising for higher riskfree rates and the equity riskpremiums).
17] See [link] (showing the United States has among the lowest equity riskpremiums in the world); Luzi Hail and Christian Leuz, International Differences in the Cost of Equity Capital: Do Legal Institutions and Securities Regulation Matter?, Division of CorporationFinance, No Action Letter: Latham and Watkins (Mar.
After the 2008 market crisis, I resolved that I would be far more organized in my assessments and updating of equity riskpremiums, in the United States and abroad, as I looked at the damage that can be inflicted on intrinsic value by significant shifts in riskpremiums, i.e., my definition of a crisis.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 8,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content